Assessing Your Strengths – Hungarian Validation of the 24-Item Values in Action Inventory of Strengths on a Large Sample Virág ZÁBÓ, Attila OLÁH, Dávid ERÁT & András VARGHA EJMH Vol 18, e0012, 1-16; https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.18.2023.0012 Received: 31 May 2023; Accepted: 11 September 2023; Online: 27 October 2023 Section: Research Papers
Download full text
Abstract
Introduction: Several studies have shown the inconsistent factorial structures of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths between cultures.
Aims: This paper describes an adapted Hungarian version of the 24-item Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for adults.
Methods: Participants in three online self-report questionnaire-based crosssectional studies (Ʃn = 10,911) filled in the 24-item Values in Action Inventory of Strengths, the Global Well-being Scale, Huppert’s and Diener’s Flourishing Scales, and the Positivity Scale.
Results: The exploratory factor analyses provided evidence for four factors: Wisdom and Knowledge; Humanity; Temperance; and Spirituality and Transcendence. The scales showed excellent internal consistency values in each study. The confirmatory factor analyses of the subsamples also showed a good fit. Low discriminant but excellent content validity was proved. Participants rated themselves highest on Humanity and lowest on Temperance. Women reported significantly higher values on both the Humanity and the Spirituality and Transcendence virtue scales than did men. The Wisdom and Knowledge virtue showed a positive correlation with education level. Among those living alone, Humanity was significantly lower, while the level of Humanity among married people stood significantly higher than in any other group.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the Hungarian version of the 24-item Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for adults serves as a suitable measure for assessing character strengths and virtues.
Keywords
character strengths, virtues, mental health, positive psychology, positive psychology assessment measure
Corresponding author
Virág ZÁBÓ
Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary & Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Co-authors
Attila OLÁH
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-1347
Dávid ERÁT
Department of Sociology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-2713
András VARGHA
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Person- and Family-oriented Health Science Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-8227
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.